Sunday, February 17, 2008

eco RE Art in cultural historical perspective

This post is intended as a brief overview of the cultural historical roots of ecological and re-use art.

Certainly humans are for the most part a resourceful lot. Re-use is not new. It is a rather old practice that developed due to a scarcity of materials from which to work. It has only been in these modern times that that we have lost sight of the preciousness of resources.

Many native cultures began using iron nails and other man made items that would wash up on shore from shipwrecks long before contact was made. The peoples of the Northwest coast of what is now Alaska and Western Canada made both tools and art using such items.

The roots of re-use in the euro-centric cannon of "high art" can be traced back to Marcel Duchamp's notion of the "readymade".

With the invention of mass reproduction many items became abundant and became to be viewed as materials for creation by some artists. With the publication of catalogs came the invent of collage. Artists associated with the Dada collective in the early part of the 20th century (1916-1920's) such as Hannah Hoch and Kurt Schwitters are excellent examples of early collage and found object art.

Other notable artist who pioneered and influenced subsequent generations of artists in the areas of re-use are Joseph Cornell with his shadow box creations and the abstract expression painter Robert Rauschenberg for his use of found objects in his work. The use of found objects in the creation of artworks seems to explode in the post WWII era. (There are many notable artists working in re-use from this point in time on that I will not mention here.)

Enter the ECO

Most likely all the artists up until this time were exploring the possibilities of these new mediums rather than trying to explicitly make an environmental statement.

During the social revolution that took place in the 1960's many artists began to shift their focus to social and environmental issues. Artists such as Joseph Beuys and Hans Haacke began creating works of art, both physical and performative that challenged the status quo.  Though the majority of what they did was focused more on the the socio-political aspects of their work, there was some degree of re-use happening. What is significant about these artists is their expansion of art as a tool for comment on the social and political environments.

With the broadening concept of what art was, walking artists such as Richard Long and Hamish Fulton began to emerge. Their works are based solely upon the act of walking and are represented in various forms of documentation, from photographs to poems, maps to installations. Their work paved the way for the most popularly known "environmental" artist to date: Andy Goldsworthy.

At the same time artists were continuing to break down the barriers that were thought to seperate art from other disciplines such as science. In the later part of the 20th century artists began to make significant contributions to scientific fields. Mel Chin's Revival Field (1990-present) and Buster Simpson's Hudson River Purge (1991) are both excellent examples of artists who have blurred the boundaries of these disciplines.


Re-Use Art with an Eco Message

What I would like to promote through BRING Gallery is art that is based in both re-use and contains an ecological message.( Of course I am also concerned with issues such as aesthetic value, quality of craft, etc. ) Here I will point to a few artists' work that we have received in our inbox and some of which you will probably be seeing at BRING Gallery in the coming months.

Jud Turner is a local sculptor who works in with lots of re-use and found objects. This piece is called "Wired" (2007) as I believe was made from items actually purchased at BRING Recycling. The statement it makes about waste and over consumption coupled with the re-use element make it a very strong piece in my opinion. This piece will be part of our up coming Earth Day exhibition.


U of O MFA student John Paul Gardner's current body of work Containment addresses the conflict between nature and man made structures. His sculptures will be on display this coming June and July at BRING Gallery.





Another artist we are considering for exhibition at BRING Gallery is Sarah Nicole Phillips who is currently working on a series of collages created from security envelopes that depict places in nature where one might find security...







NOTE: See my previous posts below for more examples of art that is compelling in either content and/or form...

Saturday, February 16, 2008

2 artists + 6 months of trash = masterpiece


This piece by Tim Noble and Sue Webster is currently my favorite reUse artwork. What would appear to be a pile of trash in ordinary light is transformed into a masterpiece with one single spot light that reveals what might be a collaborative self portrait. The artists as seen through their trash...

The seagulls are a great touch too.

Tim Noble and Sue Webster
Dirty White Trash [With Gulls] 1998
Six months' worth of the artists' rubbish
Variable dimensions
© the artists
& Courtesy of tate.org.uk

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Chris Jordan's Intolerable Beauty- An Example of What Kind of Non-ReUse Art We Would Consider Showing at BRING Gallery


The question of what art beyond re-use art we might consider showing at BRING Gallery has come up in several different discussions lately. Everyone seems to want to know where we draw the line. Is a landscape painting enough to fulfill the mission of promoting artists "that aim to improve our relationship with the natural world through the use of reclaimed materials and by addressing pressing environmental issues in their art."

The short answer is no. Of course it is much more complicated than that. If the landscape paintings were made with discarded materials, that would give it more credibility, or if there was an explicit message about consumption or waste, then it would get further consideration.


A great example would be the photography of Chris Jordan. Photography in itself is not reuse art, nor is it particularly environmentally friendly. Yet the message Jordan is able to communicate through his photography is a valuable one. His "Intolerable Beauty: Protraits of American Mass Consumption" series would be hard to pass up should he want to show at BRING.

The images are compelling because they address our unabashed consumption and waste. The images are both beautiful and repelling. They draw you in and spit you out. I find it fascinating that I am entranced with the images themselves, but repulsed by the story they tell. Taken as formal works of art they are as beautiful as any number of abstract paintings, still-life photographs or landscapes. Seen in context of modern society and a body work, the message is clear that we need to reflect on the way we live. 

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Tom Deininger: Creating Art Out of Cultures Clutter


I came across the work of Tom Deininger while researching eco-art. He was part of a group show and his work really stood out. He creates his "pictures" by assembling hundreds (if not thousands) of objects in a mosaic like mural. These assemblages are 3 dimensional, and when viewed from the right perspective, they create an image.


Imagine going to every thrift store, goodwill, value village,  salvation army and yard sale, in a 100 mile radius, hit a handful of dumpsters while you are at it, gather up all the trashiest junk you can find. Now imagine a warehouse sized studio where Tom sorts and assembles his amazing "pictures". Or just check out the videos on his website and you won't have to try too hard to imagine it.


The video here is a look at one of his pieces that he made as a tribute to famous pop culture icon. Can you guess who she is? See if you can spot the reference to JFK's assassination. But really you should check out the video of his studio, it's mind blowing. The guy must have either married well or be a trust-funder.



But forget about that monsterous studio for a minute and focus on the materials he is working with. For the most part it is the kind of plastic trash that is filling our landfills. Its outrageous that it even exists and for the most part we try to pretend it doesn't exist. But there it is, and Tom's got the time and space to turn it into something amazing. I wouldn't exactly call his work beautiful, but it does make you think.



Sunday, January 6, 2008

BRING Gallery & Bag Habit

In late October of 2007 I took on a volunteer position as Gallery Co-Manager for BRING Recycling in Eugene, OR. BRING's mission is to promote recycling and thus as an extention of BRING Recycling, BRING Gallery's mission is to showcase the creative efforts of artists that aim to improve our relationship with the planet through their art.

It's been very exciting being part of shaping the vision and direction of BRING's art space. Together with my partner Elizabeth Lamb, we are working hard to make BRING Gallery into a professional non-profit art space. It has also been exciting to research art that matches the vision we have crafted for the gallery. 


One of the most exciting pieces I have come across thus far in my research is a piece by Canadian artist Shannon Harvey called Bag Habit. Her creation is essentially a gigantic shopping bag made from over 100 different bags all sewn together. This is the average number of bags used by just one Canadian over a four month period.


What is really cool about this piece is that it is a simple concept with an instant impact. The sheer size makes you think about all the waste. Not only that, but she used items readily available and involved her community in the project. Pretty cool.